WEBVTT
00:00:00.160 --> 00:00:01.760
It's like, yeah, why can't we just use the model?
00:00:01.760 --> 00:00:03.680
Let's push it to get to that stage.
00:00:03.680 --> 00:00:11.279
And sure, there's risk and there's, you know, all this other stuff with it, but I don't think we're that far from being able to, you know, actually realize that.
00:00:11.279 --> 00:00:14.160
It's a huge opportunity once we can take advantage of it.
00:00:14.160 --> 00:00:17.440
And that leads into the whole industrialized construction thing.
00:00:17.440 --> 00:00:20.320
You know, seeing that end of it, that's huge.
00:00:20.320 --> 00:00:25.679
Companies who can take take advantage of that integration are gonna see value.
00:00:56.799 --> 00:01:01.759
I am Ryan Ware, and really excited about this conversation that we're about to have.
00:01:01.759 --> 00:01:10.079
It is an area that from my career focusing in architecture and construction was a big part of what I wanted to achieve.
00:01:10.079 --> 00:01:17.359
So today we're having with us Brian Scrippak with the Design Build Institute of America.
00:01:17.359 --> 00:01:18.879
Hey Brian, how are you doing?
00:01:18.879 --> 00:01:19.359
Good.
00:01:19.359 --> 00:01:20.319
How are you, Ryan?
00:01:20.319 --> 00:01:21.439
Doing good.
00:01:21.439 --> 00:01:25.439
Thank you so much for being willing to participate in the conversation.
00:01:25.439 --> 00:01:34.000
I know a little bit about your history and we crossed path a few times, but I want you to tell a little bit about yourself before we dive into activating curiosity.
00:01:34.319 --> 00:01:35.120
Yeah, no, sure.
00:01:35.120 --> 00:01:36.640
And and first off, thanks for having me.
00:01:36.640 --> 00:01:40.319
I appreciate the uh the invitation to be on your podcast.
00:01:40.319 --> 00:01:41.920
I'm looking forward to the conversation.
00:01:41.920 --> 00:01:54.159
Yeah, my my background uh currently now at the Design Build Institute of America, I really started um architecture by education and practice for about nine years.
00:01:54.159 --> 00:01:59.680
And then in 2005, um I took the I took the BIM tangent.
00:01:59.680 --> 00:02:08.719
I I left the world of practice uh in a traditional architecture role, um, you know, working on healthcare, higher ed projects, which is really where I spent most of my career.
00:02:08.719 --> 00:02:16.800
Um, but then I started um, you know, I started working with technology and implementing it in different firms.
00:02:16.800 --> 00:02:21.840
Um I did that for uh really a short time, uh about two years.
00:02:21.840 --> 00:02:25.520
And then I went back to the design firm that I left to become a BIM manager.
00:02:25.520 --> 00:02:37.680
Um and I was in that role uh a couple different firms since then, um, you know, starting in architecture, and then in 2012, I had the opportunity to join a firm here in Pittsburgh, Astorino.
00:02:37.680 --> 00:02:49.520
Uh the first project I worked on, we were a uh about a between 100, 100, probably like 125-person AE firm that also had this construction management group.
00:02:49.520 --> 00:02:55.120
And the first project that I worked on was a healthcare facility where we did it in what we called design-led design build.
00:02:55.120 --> 00:03:12.240
So we were the architect, the engineer, and we were also the design builder, the you know, the the construction manager executing on this project and being able to see this kind of continuation of what we were able to do as the single entity to deliver the projects was pretty exciting.
00:03:12.240 --> 00:03:15.599
Um, we had eventually been acquired shortly after that.
00:03:15.599 --> 00:03:36.159
We were acquired by Canon Design, and they were really interested in this this kind of design-led design build thing that we had built out, and you know, we had a similar you know, market segment profile uh that we were working in and had the opportunity to work there for till 2021 when I joined DBA DBIA and working on a lot of different projects.
00:03:36.159 --> 00:04:00.400
Um, you know, a lot of design build work, whether we were doing it internally, we may have just been the architect or just the engineer, but really seeing all these multiple facets was interesting, and then you know, looking for for somewhat of a career change, uh, you know, happen to be in the right spot at the right time when uh DVIA was looking to really advance the technology conversation with and design build.
00:04:00.400 --> 00:04:11.039
So I had the opportunity to take on this role and lead the conversation about you know BIM VDC and you know all of the what now is becoming you know anything tangential to that.
00:04:11.039 --> 00:04:17.360
You know, there's so many other technologies that are evolving how we design, construct, and operate the built environment.
00:04:17.360 --> 00:04:19.680
It's it's really exploded beyond that.
00:04:19.680 --> 00:04:26.240
So yeah, that's uh that was my my winding career path to DBIA.
00:04:26.480 --> 00:04:28.800
Well, I you know, that thank you for sharing that.
00:04:28.800 --> 00:04:35.040
I think I first heard your name, yes, when you were focusing and transitioning into the to the BIM world.
00:04:35.040 --> 00:04:40.319
Um, you know, and that was that 2005, 2006 kind of area.
00:04:40.319 --> 00:04:42.639
Yeah, we are starting to look at it, you know.
00:04:42.639 --> 00:04:45.680
You know, most people know my background as an architecture as well.
00:04:45.680 --> 00:04:51.920
And it is, you know, your name was kind of coming out as that leader in that that BIM area.
00:04:51.920 --> 00:04:54.240
Fast forward 20 years later.
00:04:54.240 --> 00:05:02.079
And like you mentioned and talk about it a lot on the podcast, is this industrialized construction area and this convergence.
00:05:02.079 --> 00:05:20.480
So I'm sure we'll get into a lot of that as it relates to, you know, one being a uh really a delivery model and process and how that's evolved, and then accepting of this, you know, technology within the industry um throughout that delivery model.
00:05:20.480 --> 00:05:30.000
So I'm glad you shared your perspective, what you enjoyed about it inside of a firm and how the firm started to kind of gravitate uh towards that.
00:05:30.000 --> 00:05:51.360
So you know, I always like to kick off, you know, the first question really being around knowing that that most people who who have a career like yours where you've you've transitioned right throughout, you know, whether your role was traditional practicing architecture to I see an opportunity here, an opportunity here to help kind of solve a problem.
00:05:51.360 --> 00:06:06.879
So and you could take this in a couple of paths because I know one, the DBIA versus yourself, but that you know, the really that problem that you were like, you know what, this might be an opportune time, but like this is what I've really been passionate about solving.
00:06:06.959 --> 00:06:10.720
Yeah, I I I think it's just efficiency, right?
00:06:10.720 --> 00:06:19.519
And I I can remember um, you know, working on projects, you know, detailing things, and okay, I'm gonna change something in my floor plan.
00:06:19.519 --> 00:06:21.279
You know, this is going back to 2005.
00:06:21.279 --> 00:06:24.240
I gotta update my floor plan, I'm gonna update the elevation, I go update this.
00:06:24.240 --> 00:06:26.240
Wait, there's a tool that I can just do that once.
00:06:26.240 --> 00:06:27.279
Why am I not using that?
00:06:27.279 --> 00:06:30.560
Oh my gosh, why that is there's such efficiency?
00:06:30.560 --> 00:06:41.040
I just think about the the kind of the unfortunate mundane nature of the construction document process, the traditional construction document process.
00:06:41.040 --> 00:06:49.920
And if, like, wow, if there's things in the if there's technology-driven solutions that can take this away so I can focus on other things, how much better would I be?
00:06:49.920 --> 00:06:58.000
And thinking through the detail, not worrying about updating something in seven different spots and trace going down the rabbit hole of updating it everywhere.
00:06:58.000 --> 00:07:02.240
Um, I think those were that was just the basic, you know, insight.
00:07:02.240 --> 00:07:06.720
Um, you know, back in 2005, seeing that, be like, wow, I could do this so much.
00:07:06.720 --> 00:07:13.759
Oh, wait, I can get a rendering out of something that I'm building my construction documents from, and I don't have to go into another platform and do it.
00:07:13.759 --> 00:07:16.000
And wait, I can get my door schedule here.
00:07:16.000 --> 00:07:20.160
I don't have to update it, my my plans, and then go over to Excel to do it.
00:07:20.160 --> 00:07:21.600
Oh, wait, I don't have to do it.
00:07:21.600 --> 00:07:23.439
It was all of those things.
00:07:23.439 --> 00:07:36.720
And for me, you know, having that opportunity, leaving practice, going into, you know, working in that Autodesk reseller channel and having this, you know, getting my hands on this new tool and going back to my peers in the industry was like, look at what we can do.
00:07:36.720 --> 00:07:38.160
This is amazing, this is great.
00:07:38.160 --> 00:07:42.240
And then I very quickly realized I don't want to be selling this anymore, I want to go do it.
00:07:42.240 --> 00:07:42.720
Right.
00:07:42.720 --> 00:07:52.079
Now I went back and did it and implemented it in our firm and you know, really tried to drive all of these experiences that I had and you know, try to move it forward.
00:07:52.079 --> 00:07:55.360
So and it seems kind of simple, but it's just efficiency, right?
00:07:55.360 --> 00:08:00.079
We all, you know, design, you know, design firms, there's an efficiency there.
00:08:00.079 --> 00:08:06.000
We we do stuff in one platform, we do redo it again, another platform, we do it again another platform, then we send it and share it.
00:08:06.000 --> 00:08:09.279
And it was just like there, there's a better way to do these things.
00:08:09.279 --> 00:08:15.519
I can be more efficient using this building information modeling tool that's out there.
00:08:15.519 --> 00:08:20.079
Um, and then you know, moving beyond that, it was how we collaborate.
00:08:20.079 --> 00:08:42.799
And that was, you know, just aside from you know, design build, you know, I wasn't thinking about design build back then, but I can remember a couple of projects in like 07-08 where you know the whole the use of Revit, which is what I was seeing in the market I was in, there's other tools out there, but you know, was the architects were gravitating towards it, and then we saw the engineers start grabbing toward it, gravitating toward it.
00:08:42.799 --> 00:08:54.960
We had a in Columbus, we had a large courthouse project where we had, I can remember by that by the end of the project, we could barely open the model to print out the record drawings, you know, for our final deliverables for PDFs.
00:08:54.960 --> 00:08:56.320
It was so big.
00:08:56.320 --> 00:09:02.480
Um, but we had all of this, and then the next project I was working on, we were starting to see the contractor work on it.
00:09:02.480 --> 00:09:15.919
Um, and you know, we had the opportunity, there was a large, large healthcare project here just outside of Pittsburgh we were doing with Turner and seeing what they were doing and how the information that we created as designers could be utilized in construction.
00:09:15.919 --> 00:09:36.320
That was another, I was like, hey, we got to break down these walls and collaborate better and you know, see how we can share this information all the way to working with Ohio State and being one of the authors with my you know colleagues from Messer, uh you know, writing the Ohio State BIM project delivery standard and understanding how this went downstream to owners.
00:09:36.320 --> 00:09:51.600
So, you know, the challenge is really one of this connectivity and life cycle management of a project and you know producing quality deliverables that can be taken advantage of the entire life cycle of a project to deliver better work for our owners.
00:09:54.240 --> 00:09:57.759
I mean, there's so many good things there to kind of dive into.
00:09:57.759 --> 00:10:01.919
I I I want to pick on the first word that you said, which was efficiency.
00:10:01.919 --> 00:10:18.639
And and I think you know, when I we think about tools and all the technology, I mean I saw I actually saw an image on your VDC primer from the DVIA, and there's a um um off to the side is the digital pad.
00:10:18.639 --> 00:10:27.519
I'm like, I bet most people don't know what that is, but a digitizing pad was a mouse that you would you would look at or onto the side.
00:10:27.519 --> 00:10:29.360
There was no toll bar on the screen.
00:10:29.360 --> 00:10:31.840
So that's how I'm dating myself, but that's how I'm gonna do it.
00:10:31.840 --> 00:10:32.799
I remember those, yep.
00:10:32.799 --> 00:10:37.279
Yeah, and CAD from from hand drafting, but okay, let's go back to the efficiency.
00:10:37.279 --> 00:10:41.840
Um there it's a business, right?
00:10:41.840 --> 00:11:01.360
Architecture firms are a business, and I think a lot of times that efficiency can relate to the success of the business and the bottom line, but it also has a human cost to it of like, yeah, who wants to keep opening Excel to do you know door schedules, you know, and updating it, and it's not automatic.
00:11:01.360 --> 00:11:23.519
So you did recognize that very early on that this intelligent system, you know, which was at that time Revit, everybody using it, was about the human not having to go through something repeatedly, you know, not have to go through something that brought just you know little value, if anything, to the other side.
00:11:23.519 --> 00:11:49.279
And then you started recognizing like, hey, there's there's something here where not only from a a design but a construction side to to an owner side of linking all of these things together better so that you know we're all delivering a better project to the client, but also experiencing something different.
00:11:49.279 --> 00:11:53.200
So is that is that something that you felt as you went through it?
00:11:53.200 --> 00:11:57.440
Like, hey, we're we all seem to be enjoying this a little better.
00:11:57.759 --> 00:11:59.919
Yeah, I mean, I I I think it was, right?
00:11:59.919 --> 00:12:05.440
And people were I I can remember doing product demonstrations, and people are like, oh, you just did that that quick.
00:12:05.440 --> 00:12:06.320
Oh my goodness.
00:12:06.320 --> 00:12:14.639
And you know, I can remember taking experiences that I had on projects and pain points and showing other people, be like, this is the opportunity that you have.
00:12:14.639 --> 00:12:16.879
Um yeah, I think that was big.
00:12:16.879 --> 00:12:28.639
Uh, I I think the other thing was one of the things I was always interested in, even in my my early days of modeling and and working with our project teams, or just, you know, don't do things twice.
00:12:28.639 --> 00:12:30.720
You know, that that's just a direct efficiency.
00:12:30.720 --> 00:12:32.159
But it was a balancing act too.
00:12:32.159 --> 00:12:42.000
At the early days of Revit, I mean, I think we people were excited about the availability of information and they were doing all these other things.
00:12:42.000 --> 00:12:47.840
And I think there was a little bit of a bump in the road of like, oh, well, it's just making, we're making us do more drawings.
00:12:47.840 --> 00:12:50.799
It's like, well, no, people are you're making yourself do more drawings.
00:12:50.799 --> 00:12:57.039
You're like, oh, I can cut a section every five feet, so I'm gonna double the amount of wall sections that I have on my sheet because I can.
00:12:57.039 --> 00:13:00.399
It's like, well, no, that doesn't, you know, no, no stop.
00:13:00.399 --> 00:13:08.000
Just because you can doesn't mean you should, was uh was a huge rallying cry back in the early in in the in my early days.
00:13:08.000 --> 00:13:09.279
It's like, well, should I model this?
00:13:09.279 --> 00:13:10.240
It's like, no, why?
00:13:10.240 --> 00:13:11.039
Why would you do that?
00:13:11.039 --> 00:13:16.399
You know, you're you know, and I think it's interesting, even back then it was, do I model something?
00:13:16.399 --> 00:13:22.480
How do I model this for the sake of getting in on the construction documents?
00:13:22.480 --> 00:13:49.840
And I think, you know, not to go on a I'm gonna go on a tangent here, but you know, this is that that's one of the things that I that still pains me about, you know, construction documents and shop drawings really being a existing hurdle to you know the full embracing of what we can do with these models because we have to spend time modeling something, but 99% of the time our contract is that paper set of deliverables.
00:13:49.840 --> 00:13:52.720
So people deviate from the model to get it looking right on the drawings.
00:13:52.720 --> 00:13:56.159
And that was always a historic challenge, but you had to get past that.
00:13:56.159 --> 00:14:01.120
But now we can we can build things now that everybody, you know, people know how to model efficiently.
00:14:01.120 --> 00:14:05.679
It was always like, why would I model something half-assed?
00:14:05.679 --> 00:14:06.159
Yeah.
00:14:06.159 --> 00:14:09.759
Just so I can overdraw over it and two-dimensional stuff.
00:14:09.759 --> 00:14:11.840
It's like that doesn't that never made any sense to me.
00:14:11.840 --> 00:14:20.559
And that was always like uh, you know, the kind of people side of you know, transitioning that culture and the workflow of people to think about like do it here so you don't have to do it here.
00:14:20.559 --> 00:14:20.879
Yeah.
00:14:20.879 --> 00:14:26.159
If you do it here, the structural engineer can take advantage of it, or somebody else can take advantage of it.
00:14:26.159 --> 00:14:28.240
And you know, how are you gonna utilize it?
00:14:28.240 --> 00:14:30.720
I think now that's where we're getting at in the industry.
00:14:30.720 --> 00:14:36.720
The you know, the accessibility of these models now becoming expected deliverables from project teams.
00:14:36.720 --> 00:14:42.159
We have to have higher quality um, you know, skills and output that we're doing.
00:14:42.159 --> 00:14:54.159
And I think what it's really gonna flip is when we start, you know, being able to rely on a model as a useful deliverable and not having to detail things like you know, how many times we have to say hot's on the right, cold's on the left?
00:14:54.159 --> 00:15:00.000
You know, the this little symbol means it's a brick unit as opposed to a 45-degree, you know, dash.
00:15:00.000 --> 00:15:10.480
My my boss at Astorino was like ringing that bell in you know 2012 when I when I joined them, he's like, why can't we just use, you know, and that that always stuck with me, right?
00:15:10.480 --> 00:15:12.320
It's like, yeah, why can't we just use the model?
00:15:12.320 --> 00:15:14.320
Let's push it to get to that stage.
00:15:14.320 --> 00:15:24.720
And sure there's risk and there's you know all this other stuff with it, but I don't think we're that far from being able to, you know, actually realize that it's a huge opportunity once we can take advantage of it.
00:15:24.720 --> 00:15:30.879
And that leads into the whole industrialized construction thing, you know, seeing that end of it, that's huge.
00:15:30.879 --> 00:15:36.000
Companies who can take take advantage of that integration are gonna see value.
00:15:36.320 --> 00:15:36.960
Yeah.
00:15:36.960 --> 00:15:45.600
I mean, it's yeah, flashbacks to uh to practicing, but that idea of, like you said, the model.
00:15:45.600 --> 00:15:49.360
What was the model when we first started in Revit?
00:15:49.360 --> 00:15:54.159
What was the model meant for right versus those documents?
00:15:54.159 --> 00:15:58.559
Like, what is a permit set versus the construction document set?
00:15:58.559 --> 00:16:03.600
Um and and figuring that all out and the level of model that you were going to go.
00:16:03.600 --> 00:16:06.080
And at that time, we were not talking LODs, right?
00:16:06.080 --> 00:16:09.840
There was no level of design, it was just yeah, yeah, it didn't exist.
00:16:09.840 --> 00:16:18.720
And you mentioned it's like, hey, people were hiding things in wall sections to you know, in in an effort to speed things up.
00:16:18.720 --> 00:16:32.720
But like you said, there was a lot of over documentation of things and working with younger you know, designers, it was always like, what are you trying to tell the trades?
00:16:32.720 --> 00:16:36.879
Which trade are you telling what in this wall section and this detail?
00:16:36.879 --> 00:16:46.320
So this connection, you know, in the end, it has got to be enough information for someone to build right from a document set.
00:16:46.320 --> 00:16:50.879
But that said, we're we're going back to this.
00:16:50.879 --> 00:17:16.079
I'm gonna pull back to the humans for a second, because as we're going through this transition, um there is a level of resistance inside firms in 2005, 6, 7, and even hear it today from a BEM modeling standpoint, which there there is, you know, that piece of it to those levels of design and a misconception of what a lot of these things mean.
00:17:16.079 --> 00:17:39.839
But when we think about that, you know, resistance or those barriers or those obstacles as you fast forward now, like what have we maybe have learned about the human piece, because people's a big part of it for you, that human piece to help them see okay, the model is an opportunity.
00:17:39.839 --> 00:17:48.960
We may have always done it with documentation and paper documents, but how does the team see the model utilize it?
00:17:48.960 --> 00:17:54.640
How do they know that there's been a change, that there's been some sort of update, right?
00:17:54.640 --> 00:17:58.000
And uh through a normal bulletin process and things like that.
00:17:58.319 --> 00:17:58.960
Yeah.
00:17:58.960 --> 00:18:00.480
Oh, go ahead and finish.
00:18:00.559 --> 00:18:02.640
I mean, no, I'm just gonna, yeah, no, you could dive in.
00:18:02.640 --> 00:18:11.519
I was just gonna say, like, how what have you learned or seen that you're now, you know, from your perspective, starting to help teams apply to get to that resistance?
00:18:12.160 --> 00:18:15.359
I mean, I think that resistance is based on risk, right?
00:18:15.359 --> 00:18:30.079
There is a risk to I don't I don't know what may be wrong in the model or what can be assumed in the model, but I understand what the drawings look like and read, and I understand that I've done my job to document that.
00:18:30.079 --> 00:18:35.839
I think that's I think that is still the prevailing issue for the industry, right?
00:18:35.839 --> 00:18:53.119
There's still that there's some, you know, black box, you know, concern going on about what's in the model, or you know, oh, I have this, I have a design option, or I have this other thing that's in there, and I don't want somebody to be concerned with this, but I think it all goes back to communication, right?
00:18:53.119 --> 00:18:58.880
Using technology doesn't alleviate the fact for us to communicate and collaborate with one another.
00:18:58.880 --> 00:19:02.319
And you know, something you mentioned earlier, LOD.
00:19:02.319 --> 00:19:14.079
I've been part of the the LOD committee, I think I back in 2012 when I started uh here in Pittsburgh at Astorino, my my boss Ron Delaria was on the committee and I got engaged in that.
00:19:14.079 --> 00:19:19.519
And to today, I it is the most valuable tool to mitigate just that.
00:19:19.519 --> 00:19:29.039
You know, being able to have this kind of pool planning effort on a project and say, this is how we're gonna evolve our deliverables, this model-based deliverable.
00:19:29.039 --> 00:19:54.640
These are the individual components, these are the level of development that they've advanced to and what they can be relied upon, and mapping out for people to be able to tell for a structural engineer to have a plan to say that my you know, structural columns and all of my steel framing is gonna be at this LOD to be relied upon by you, the architect, and the rest of the team at this stage is valuable, right?
00:19:54.640 --> 00:19:58.160
It's not I'm gonna wait till 100% or 75% CDs.
00:19:58.160 --> 00:19:58.960
Yeah, I got it.
00:19:58.960 --> 00:20:00.960
Well, what are these incremental milestones?
00:20:00.960 --> 00:20:08.400
And yeah, maybe I don't have all the documentation done for that submittal, but it's been defined and thought out, and now I know where my ceiling's at.
00:20:08.400 --> 00:20:23.599
Now I know where the bottom of that steel beam is, and now the str the mechanical engineer and the plumbing engineer can understand how much space they have and where they're gonna route things through, but I don't need to wait until a set of construction documents come out and it says a W whatever on it to stand it and see it.
00:20:23.599 --> 00:20:27.920
I think that starts to accelerate the ability to collaborate and communicate.
00:20:27.920 --> 00:20:33.680
Um, I think the other challenge is having that knowledge and understanding at the outset of a project.
00:20:33.680 --> 00:20:50.160
Um, and this is so at DBIA, one of the documents that that our committee actually just published, not you know, it was in October we published it, we just presented it a couple weeks ago at our conference, is the VDC project leaders' roles and responsibilities on design build project.
00:20:50.160 --> 00:20:56.880
And we break it out into um you know a DBIA primer field where we you know have three major sections, right?
00:20:56.880 --> 00:21:03.359
It's people, process, and technology, and we have 16 different implementing techniques um throughout the document.
00:21:03.359 --> 00:21:11.839
And you know, this this engagement and understanding about what people are gonna do needs to start at the outset of a RFP and RFQ review.
00:21:11.839 --> 00:21:14.000
This is what our deliverables are.
00:21:14.000 --> 00:21:22.799
Um, some owners may have very robust deliverables, like I talked about you know, working on Ohio State standards and say, hey, this is what we need to address.
00:21:22.799 --> 00:21:24.960
We need somebody on the team to manage through this.
00:21:24.960 --> 00:21:37.839
Other owners may not have that, and that's fine, but somebody on the project team needs to say, this is how we're gonna use technology to meet our deliverables, which may be a stack of paper at the end of the day, but technology can be more efficient.
00:21:37.839 --> 00:21:39.039
How are we gonna communicate?
00:21:39.039 --> 00:21:40.480
How are we gonna collaborate?
00:21:40.480 --> 00:21:45.200
How are we gonna integrate as a team to deliver this project successfully?
00:21:45.200 --> 00:21:53.839
And I think that's another big important part of the people side is who's leading that charge, having somebody that's skilled to be able to do that on a project and work with a team.
00:21:54.400 --> 00:21:54.720
Yeah.
00:21:54.720 --> 00:21:57.920
Yeah, I think you know, you talked about risk.
00:21:57.920 --> 00:22:05.680
It's any new thing we as humans, we we all think like the worst case scenario.
00:22:05.680 --> 00:22:11.839
Like so, so fear fear is the first thing that comes in.
00:22:11.839 --> 00:22:16.880
And you know, clarity is what we're all what we all want.
00:22:16.880 --> 00:22:33.599
And by having you know what you're describing as as the LODs and kind of mapping things out, it'll bring enough clarity and setting those expectations, but even pulling back to that human piece of hey, you've never done this before.
00:22:33.599 --> 00:22:34.319
Yeah.
00:22:34.319 --> 00:22:38.640
It is going to feel like you are in a relearn stage.
00:22:38.640 --> 00:22:40.240
It is going to feel slower.
00:22:40.240 --> 00:22:43.359
It is going to feel it is new territory.
00:22:43.359 --> 00:22:55.200
Um, I always like Amy Edmondson, and that's what she focused on that new territory piece of learning, you know, learning to understand like you will struggle in this new area.
00:22:55.200 --> 00:23:01.839
And I think the construction industry, because of the I always think, you know, we do have low margins.
00:23:01.839 --> 00:23:10.480
There is that low um kind of net profitability that anything that is a risk is like, man, I could lose the business.
00:23:10.480 --> 00:23:13.119
And we talked about it on another podcast before.
00:23:13.119 --> 00:23:32.799
So you focusing on, hey, that human piece, like you're going like this is different, but here's the opportunity and advantages, which is where you you kind of ended, where design build is meant from a collaborative, um, I want it's not even alternative anymore, right?
00:23:32.799 --> 00:23:38.880
There's so much percentage being used with uh design build now, it is almost a majority.
00:23:38.880 --> 00:24:05.039
But this delivery model is about solving things sooner, and that we don't need to be 100% complete with it, which means clarity, 100% clarity will not exist, but it'll there'll be enough for you to to learn um as you're evolving through it and have enough information to be able to make concise decisions as a team.
00:24:06.079 --> 00:24:07.759
I think that's important to understand, right?
00:24:07.759 --> 00:24:12.960
Yeah, and and design build is no longer, you know, alternative delivery model.
00:24:12.960 --> 00:24:37.039
Our you know, last FMI report, you know, showed that nearly 50% of projects are being you know delivered as is design build, and that you know, traditional design bid build model, you know, that hard bid is is declining rapidly because people know there's a better way to do things and and having a collaborative team under that that single contract structure is is advantageous, right?
00:24:37.039 --> 00:24:39.839
There's no there's no blurry gray area, right?
00:24:39.839 --> 00:24:52.559
It's not I'm the design professional, and I'm my job is to give the owner a set of construction documents, and that owner is gonna take that, put it out to bid and do it, and somebody's gonna go build off of it, and I'm gonna answer questions when called upon.
00:24:52.559 --> 00:24:59.440
And but my my duty is to the owner, not the builder, and you know, the all the finger pointing that inherently comes from that.
00:24:59.440 --> 00:25:19.119
So having that design builder have that contract with the owner to provide design and construction services with the team underneath them in whatever form that design builder takes, um, you know, is you know, drives clarity in what the objectives are and how they get achieved.
00:25:19.119 --> 00:25:37.119
And, you know, I'm a big I know there's there's oftentimes apprehension, well, the you know, that's a general contractor and they're gonna beat me up or whatever from a design professional, but you know, looking at different the same way technology evolves and has innovation, you know, or the organizational structure of firms does.
00:25:37.119 --> 00:25:48.880
And I I you know the the way that the firm I was at was set up and having that single entity, that design-led design build, um, drove significant value on the projects that we had.
00:25:48.880 --> 00:25:50.799
Those were really great teams.
00:25:50.799 --> 00:26:05.599
The the opportunity to, you know, sure, once you, once you got past the friction of putting the you know, the cost estimator next to the designer and this person next to the other person, once they worked out and figured, you know, my boss said one time, he's like, you know, stop complaining.
00:26:05.599 --> 00:26:06.160
He's on your team.
00:26:06.160 --> 00:26:08.799
He's like, your check comes from the same person, work together.
00:26:08.799 --> 00:26:13.920
If it's gonna take you two hours to save him 20, that's a win for the team.
00:26:13.920 --> 00:26:16.480
Like, go, like, let's let's work through it, right?
00:26:16.480 --> 00:26:19.680
Um, you know, it's a it's a different mindset, it's a different culture.
00:26:19.680 --> 00:26:19.920
Yeah.
00:26:19.920 --> 00:26:22.480
But once you can bridge that, there's a huge opportunity.
00:26:22.480 --> 00:26:41.920
And I know I've even seen that a lot on the engineering side where you have these you know integrated firms that'll, you know, you might have a mechanical engineer, a group of mechanical engineers embedded in a you know, sheet metal fabrication shop, you know, and I, you know, seen some of those firms across the country when I'm out doing presentation stuff, and it's amazing what they're doing.
00:26:41.920 --> 00:26:47.039
They're like, they're like our shop drawings come right out of the you know, construction documents.
00:26:47.039 --> 00:26:50.640
Our engineers are using fabrication ready parts from our thing.
00:26:50.640 --> 00:26:58.000
They plug it in, we hide all the other, we turn off all the visibility of all the other extraneous stuff that they don't need for their construction documents.
00:26:58.000 --> 00:27:03.440
It goes out, boom, we hit it, and you know, we finish up a couple things and we're going direct to FAP.
00:27:03.440 --> 00:27:03.920
Yeah.
00:27:03.920 --> 00:27:06.160
And that is that is efficiency.
00:27:06.160 --> 00:27:13.200
That is leveraging technology and an innovative workflow to be more efficient at the work you're trying to accomplish.
00:27:13.200 --> 00:27:14.799
And I think that's really interesting.
00:27:15.039 --> 00:27:15.359
Yeah.
00:27:15.359 --> 00:27:22.160
No, I uh now you're talking my language, uh having spent a lot of time in direct digital manufacturing and prefab.
00:27:22.160 --> 00:27:31.920
I mean, I back when I was running that digitizer pad right off to the side, it was directly running to a cam, uh, you know, part of CAM and machines actually making things.
00:27:31.920 --> 00:27:33.920
So that was the 90s.